2016-2026 - ongoing
Maximal sanctuary / immigration noncooperation
Local noncooperation can be lawful federalism, but maximal forms risk normalizing nullification-style governance.
Claim
Federalism can become institutional deadlock when each side escalates.
What Happened
Democratic cities and states limited cooperation with federal immigration enforcement; courts have upheld some policies.
Why It Matters
Coherent enforcement and legitimate local autonomy are both at stake.
Model Read
Scores are structured judgments. The range widens when confidence falls.
Weighted toward human damage, realized harm, and durability.
Long-term damage discounted for source and causal uncertainty.
Medium confidence. Better evidence should narrow this band.
Strongest Counterargument
The anti-commandeering doctrine allows localities to refuse to use local resources for federal enforcement.
Incentive Check
Who benefits from exaggerating this?
Those who call all sanctuary policy lawless may misstate federalism doctrine.
Who benefits from minimizing this?
Those who ignore consequences for enforcement and public trust may understate costs.
Evidence
- Rule of Law Index: United States 2025analytical contextWorld Justice Project - U.S. rule-of-law scores and rank.
Methodology Caveats
Primary proof gap
No attached source is labeled primary proof yet. Treat the score as provisional until a primary record, official dataset, or court record is added.
Index limits
Watchdog and democracy-index scores are comparative signals. Component methods, time periods, and uncertainty matter before the index is used as evidence for one card.
Status caution
This card is not settled. Scores should move when a better source changes the event record, legal posture, denominator, or counterargument.
Sources
- Rule of Law Index: United States 2025
World Justice Project - watchdog
analytical contextU.S. rule-of-law scores and rank.
Related Cards
State attempts to regulate federal immigration agents
Mask/ID laws targeting federal agents raise real civil-liberties concerns but may cross into unconstitutional regulation of federal operations.
Chinese Exclusion and racial immigration law
The Chinese Exclusion Act made racial exclusion a federal immigration policy and denied equal civic belonging to a targeted group.
Immigration Act of 1924 and national-origins quotas
The Immigration Act of 1924 built national-origin quotas into federal law and expanded Asian exclusion.
Keep It Independent
Fund The Work Without Buying The Verdict
Support the public ledger, correction work, source retrieval, and model maintenance.
From $500Paid BriefA source-backed brief on one policy, institution, city, candidate, agency, or claim.
From $250/moData LicenseStructured CSV/JSON exports, score history, source metadata, and update logs.
From $750/wkSponsorshipClearly labeled sponsor placements with no score influence and no editorial veto.